Enough proof ?

After some stupid article on chess.com on the correctness of the Blackmar Diemer gambit ( cfr to my earlier blog "Another nonbeliever" ), I looked up the position that the author referred to. I was surprised that I already covered that one in May 2011. Here's the article : "Really that bad".

Today I will be going in detail in one of the resulting positions : 1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 e6 6-Bg5 Be7 7.Bd3 Nbd7 8.00 c5 ( the so-called refutation ) 9.Kh1 ( the refutation of the refutation ! ) cxd4 10.Nxd4 00 11.Qe1 (diagram).

a/ 11...Nd5 A simple way to exchange pieces, no ? 12.Nxe6!! fxe6 13.Qxe6+ Kh8 14.Qe4 (+)

b/ 11...Nc5 12.Rd1 (diagram)

...b1/ 12...Nxd3 13.Rxd3 Bd7 14.Nf3 Qe8 15.Ne5 (+=)
...b2/ 12...h6 13.Bh4 (=)
...b3/ 12...a6 13.Nf3 (=)
...b4/ 12...Bd7 13.Nb3 (=)
...b5/ 12...Kh8 13.Nb5 (+=)
...b6/ 12...Qc7 13.Qh4 (+)
...b7/ 12...Qb6 13.Bxf6 Bxf6 14.Rxf6 gxf6 15.Qh4 (+)
...b7/ 12...Qa5 13.Nd5 (++)

c/ 11...Qc7 12.Qh4 (+=)

d/ 11...Qb6 12.Qh4 (diagram

...d1/ 12...h5 13.Nb3 (=)

...d2/ 12...Re8 13.Bxf6 Nxf6 14.Rxf6 (=)

...d3/ 12...h6 13.Bxh6 gxh6 14.Qxh6 Qxd4 15.Rd4 (++)

...d4/ 12...g6 13.Rad1 (+)

e/ 11...Qa5 12.Ndb5 (diagram)

...e1/ 12...Qb4 13.a3 (=)

...e2/ 12...h6 13.Nd5 (+=)

...e3/ 12...Re8 13.Qg3 (+=)

...e4/ 12...a6 13.Nd5 (+=)

f/ 11...h6 12.Bh4 

Will be covered in a later blog.

g/ 11...b6 12.Nc6 Qe8 13.Nxe7 Qxe7 14.Ne4 (++)

h/ 11...a6 12.Qh4

...h1/ 12...h6 13.Bxh6 Ne5 14.Bxg7 Kxg7 15.Rxf6 (+=)

...h2/ 12...Re8 13.Nxe6 fxe6 14.Ne4 (+=)

Doesn't look too bad, no ?